November Poem for Alegria
I have seen concrete disintegrate under the weight of water
I have seen stone, steel, yield to students disobedient & civil
& fasting & lasting
open to the rain
& goodbye to the men & goodbye to the women angry
& the wind
frightened by the bright light, horrified by strangers
goodbye, goodbye
I have heard the tender speaking of many tongues
I have heard the breaking voice beg
Hear ends civility, now we know
the strategy of stars, continuous, exempt from tinkering & beyond numerical reduction
now we know the strategy of trees that flourish, roots protected or above,
exposed above the famished or the flooded earth
& lifting, always lifting, up the air itself
No more polishing of pain
Here ends surrender: I have seen the face of every promise from the sun
I have seen the beastial kneel besides the bodies of young poets,
standing in your tears
June Jordan
Double Indemnity (1944)
Phyllis: Just my name.
Neff: As for instance?
Phyllis: Phyllis.
Neff: Phyllis, huh. I think I like that.
Phyllis: But you're not sure.
Neff: I'd have to drive it around the block a couple of times.
Phyllis: Mr. Neff, why don't you drop by tomorrow evening around 8:30? He'll be in then.
Neff: Who?
Phyllis: My husband. You were anxious to talk to him, weren't you?
Neff: Yeah, I was. But I'm sort of getting over the idea, if you know what I mean.
Phyllis: There's a speed limit in this state, Mr. Neff, 45 miles an hour.
Neff: How fast was I going, Officer?
Phyllis: I'd say around 90.
Neff: Suppose you get down off your motorcycle and give me a ticket.
Phyllis: Suppose I let you off with a warning this time.
Neff: Suppose it doesn't take.
Phyllis: Suppose I have to whack you over the knuckles.
Neff: Suppose I bust out crying and put my head on your shoulder.
Phyllis: Suppose you try putting it on my husband's shoulder.
Neff: That tears it... 8:30 tomorrow evening, then.
Phyllis: That's what I suggested.
Neff: You'll be here too?
Phyllis: I guess so. I usually am.
Neff: Same chair, same perfume, same anklet?
Phyllis: I wonder if I know what you mean.
Neff: I wonder if you wonder.
My point is not that everything is bad
Michel Foucault, "On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in Progress," in Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Second Edition With an Afterword by and an Interview with Michel Foucault (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1983), pp. 231-232.
Angelina Weld Grimké
One by one they fall,
Like leaves,...
They are black,
They are gray.
They are white,
They are shot through with gold and fire.
They fall
They fall,
Ceaselessly.
They cover me,
They crush,
They cover
They smother.
Who will ever find me under the days?
Edupunk
I am not white, not male, and not over forty. Can I still be one?Here's Steve Wheeler's PowerPoint presentation for the Edupunk session - 'How Edupunk can save the world...'.
Steve Wheelers post on the session& Jim Grooms follow up comments on the session
Facilitator: Graham Attwell
Speakers: Steve Wheeler, Helen Keegan
Who is going to be there: (add your name) Captain Simian, Graham Attwell, Frances Bell, Cristina Costa, Helen Keegan, Josie Fraser, Steve Wheeler, Joss Winn, Kath Trinder, asher
Session notes:
Helen - Edupunk: Yes it is a white, male, middle-aged thing. Our students would be ashamed of us.
Steve - Steve spoilt us with his Edupunk manifesto - he threw in a presentation & finished with a poem. He argued its all about the attitude, about challenging and smashing structures. Edupunk is a minimalist, less is more, DIY approach, similar to making and distributing your own records. It's about breaking down the distance between the audience and the performers, about making things more personal & original.Edupunk in context is against the commodification of learning. Education should be free. Down with the walled garden of institutionally approved VLE (virtual learning environments) provision and up with PLEs (personal learning environments). Edupunk is about unleashing the anarchy - free, open content, open source, not constrained by commerce.
He also threw in Stephen Downes definition: "edupunk is student-centered, resourceful, teacher- or community-created rather than corporate-sourced, and underwritten by a progressive political stance." And an anonymous commentator on his post says: "I can't think of anything more punk than education. For the student, learning gives power to the individual. A society full of mindless drones trained to each do a single task doesn't really have the mental ability to rebel in meaningful ways. For the teacher, every day is an exercise in punk. You're almost completely under the control of your coordinator, your principals, your superintendents, your school board, the media. Often, "the man" passes down restrictive rules and decisions that don't seem to align with what's best for you or your students. Often, you're only equipped with sparse resources you're able to scrap together here and there."
Asher commented that Edupunk shouldn't have to be oppositional & that he wasn't here for a fight, but he objected to the lack of fanzine referencing.
Josie revealed that she had been a baby punker. She wondered if Edupunk was the embarrassing dad of the e-Learning world.
Steven commented that there was a clear gender divide - all of the women round the table disliked the Edupunk label, the people defending it were all white men. He wanted to hear a woman defending the term.
Josie offered to sell out and defend Edupunk for five pounds.
Sam commented on the comodification of protest. He wondered if we weren't in a perpetual state of selling out, seeing that many of the 'free' services we use are predominantly commercial entities, that we allow our data to be brought and sold in the market place.
Graham brought up the example of the School of Everything - a service which allows people to learn and teach without the constrains of the curriculum or having to jump through key skills hoops. He wondered why we need commercial finance in order to fund these kinds of services.
Scott asked us to remember Derek Jarman's 1977 punk classic Jubilee, and ask ourselves if we are Richard O'Brian or Adam Ant.
Josie argued that the important thing about Edupunk wasn't what it was called but the disruptive and creative impulse & ad hoc organisational activist approach that it represents.
Andy said that the whole discussion is a bit stupid. All we are doing is promoting something that's time has already passed. Edupunk died a couple of weeks ago.
More comments on appropriation & recreation of resources, A call for EduPirates which was met with a hearty round of Arrrs and YoHos.
Steve argued that do these kind of metaphors do have value, and that Edupunk as a label was much better than another acronym.
George commented that in transgression and overstepping the mark is precisely where learning takes place.
Asher admitted his kids didn't think he, personally was very cool but that the era and history of punk did hold fascination and represented something powerful & interesting to them.
Piratebay & bit torrent were cited. More Arrs and YoHos.
Graham wrapping up by commenting that the session had had a great deal of back and forth, people building on, responding and developing arguments in a way that wasn't often possible in the formal conference sessions. He then pimped the 5pm e-Portfolio session.



0 Comments